Proposal Development Workshop

Background

The proposal development Workshop is an intensive and comprehensive hands-on program for researcher who are interested in developing or revising a research proposal. This is a three day workshop that culminates in a mook panel review. Each session builds upon previous sessions and we rely on ongoing peer review, so you must commit to attend all sessions.

Objectives

The objectives of this workshop is to improve the scientific and technical capabilities for high-quality research proposal and to imporove the ability to clearly and concisety communicate your research proposal idea. At the end of the workshop, participants are expected to complete research protocols of their own.

Clinical Decision Making

Background

Decision in health care can be particularly challenging, because it is involving a complex process of diagnostic and therapeutic logic, patient’s preferences and values ​​and costs.

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) aims to apply the best available evidence gained from the scientific method to clinical decision making or Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

Objectives

  • Understanding the concepts and principles of CDM
  • Understanding several frameworks to support CDM
  • Being confident and competent to teach CDM to their colleagues

Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations

Background

Systematic review is an option in finding literature, but not all systematic reviews have adequate standards. Based on this information the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was developed. This method is used to assess the quality of systematic reviews. GRADE is a system for assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that are explicit, comprehensive, transparent and pragmatic.

The GRADE training is expected to provide knowledge for researchers, lecturers,  and clinicians in assessing the quality of systematic reviews as literature. This is very important if clinical decisions made will be more rational, effective and efficient, and benefit clinicians and patients.

Objectives

1. Increasing the number of visiting scientists with a high h-index.
2. Increasing the capacity of teaching staff to practice the GRADE          method in assessing the quality of systematic reviews.
3. Encouraging an increase in the number of publications, especially      systematic reviews in the journal Q1 (Cochrane Library).

Course

  1. Introduction to GRADE Approach for Rating The Quality of Evidence and The Strength of Recommendations
  2. Experience in doing SoF table using GRADE
  3. Exercise on SoF Tabl

Cochrane Systematic Review Qualitative

Background

Systematic review is scientific paper which consist of identifying, reviewing, and synthesizing all the evidence with high quality criteria of research questions. Systematic Review which came from randomized clinical trials are the most important in EBM. Researchers who do Systematic Review with or without using meta-analysis, aims to minimize biased, so that it can produce reliable scientific and can be used in clinical decision making. Comprehension of Systematic Review and how implementation in the field became the responsibility, of all personel in health service.

For that matter it takes an effort to improve and renewing scientific development, knowledge, and skills in scientific writing. This is expected to be an important skill for lecturers and health officers for improving the quality of education and health services in medical institutions. Along with task as a civitas academica community, then lecturers are required to produce scientific writing and publish in journals that have high impact factors. With that role, it is expected that lecturers have high knowledge and skills, good quality and up to date science, so that will be able to publish with a good quality paper. Along with the vision and mission, Faculty of medicine UGM who want to became World Class University, it needs good skills in all lecturers.

Objectives

  • Introducing Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Method to Improve quantity and quality of scientific writing.
  • Advancing Knowledge and skill of making Systematic Review
  • Using the best literature medical for getting information to improve quality education and health service

Participants

The course is intended for the following person :

  • Holders of medical university degree with a minimum of two years professional experience in the clinical field with past or current involvement in one of the following fields :
    1. Reasearch and/or application of EBM.
    2. Development of Clinical Guidelines.
    3. Coaching of Medical or Paramedical Theses in Health Sciences.
    4. Teaching Clinical Epidemiology/ EBM.

Course

  1. Introduction to Qualitative Systematic Reviews
  2. Question Formulation and Searching Qualitative
  3. Protocol Development Scoping Reviews
  4. Critical Appraisal Qualitative (Including Workshop)
  5. Introduction to Mixed Methods
  6. Critical Appraisal Mixed Method (Including Method)
  7. Introduction to Qualitative & Mixed Designs : Meta-Ethnography & Meta-Aggregation
  8. Data Extraction
  9. Overview of Reviews : an Ilustration

Call For Poster

Call For Poster

The poster contain research abstract that consist :

  • Tittle
  • Authors and Affiliations
  • Background
  • Aims/Goals
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion and Recommandations

Send your poster and abstract to : pusatcebufkugm@gmail.com